Alternatives to Terramate
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Terramate does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Terramate on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Terramate has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Terramate does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Terramate does not | Terramate publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 74/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Aviatoraviator.co | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Codebergcodeberg.org | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Semaphoresemaphoreci.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| GitLabgitlab.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Codacycodacy.com | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Buddybuddy.works | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Codeclimatecodeclimate.com | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Depotdepot.dev | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.