Transparency alternatives to Warp
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Warp does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 54 that differ from Warp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Warp has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Warp does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Warp does not | Warp publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Terramateterramate.io | 74/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Daytonadaytona.io | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Oktetookteto.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Codebergcodeberg.org | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Replitreplit.com | 71/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 61/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Namespacenamespace.so | 52/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Onaona.com | 52/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Retriumretrium.com | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.