SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Aviator

Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Aviator does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Aviator on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Aviator has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Aviator does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Aviator does notAviator publishes, and they do not
CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +4 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
CircleCIcircleci.com 74/100 5 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
Namespacenamespace.so 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
GitHubgithub.com 57/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Codacycodacy.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Daggerdagger.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Codercoder.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Oktetookteto.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Codebergcodeberg.org 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Buddybuddy.works 35/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Codeclimatecodeclimate.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Earthlyearthly.dev 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.