SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CEO-Vision GoFAST

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CEO-Vision GoFAST does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 55 that differ from CEO-Vision GoFAST on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CEO-Vision GoFAST has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CEO-Vision GoFAST does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CEO-Vision GoFAST does notCEO-Vision GoFAST publishes, and they do not
Templafytemplafy.com 74/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
CloudFilescloudfiles.io 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Intralinksintralinks.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Smallpdfsmallpdf.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.com 52/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Onehubonehub.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Folderitfolderit.com 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
DynaFiledynafile.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Papermarkpapermark.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
PaperOfficepaperoffice.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Ademeroademero.com 35/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 nothing Compare
Fabasoftfabasoft.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.