SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Easy Software

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Easy Software does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 54 that differ from Easy Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Easy Software has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Easy Software does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Easy Software does notEasy Software publishes, and they do not
CloudFilescloudfiles.io 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Templafytemplafy.com 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Smallpdfsmallpdf.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Intralinksintralinks.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 nothing Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Folderitfolderit.com 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Onehubonehub.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Papermarkpapermark.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
PaperOfficepaperoffice.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Fabasoftfabasoft.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
DynaFiledynafile.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Ademeroademero.com 35/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.