SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to windream

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that windream does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from windream on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

windream has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and windream does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and windream does notwindream publishes, and they do not
Templafytemplafy.com 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.com 52/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Ademeroademero.com 48/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
DynaFiledynafile.com 43/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
OpenTextopentext.com 20/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Dokmeedokmee.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
M-Filesm-files.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Thereforetherefore.net 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
DocuWaredocuware.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ecodmsecodms.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
d.velopd-velop.de 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
FileHoldfilehold.com 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.