SaaS Ranking
Menu

Xenmark: what they publish

xenmark.app · Drawing review · checked 2026-10-28

57/100CBand C

Rank 2 of 2 in Drawing review, where the median is 59.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-28. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

3 days since the newest dated result, 3 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Xenmark

xenmark.app · Drawing review

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
C 57of 100 Rank 2 of 2

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour3 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-28. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Xenmark has no such document.

Where Xenmark sits in Drawing review

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C2 100%
  4. D0 0%
  5. E0 0%
  6. F0 0%
2 vendors with a score. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Xenmark is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Xenmark states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://xenmark.app/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://xenmark.app/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://xenmark.app/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://xenmark.app/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://xenmark.app/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://xenmark.app/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://xenmark.app/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://www.xenmark.app/privacy/ · checked 2026-10-28

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://xenmark.app/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://xenmark.app/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://xenmark.app/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://xenmark.app/privacy – found, but behind a sign-in
  5. https://xenmark.app/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://xenmark.app/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://xenmark.app/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.xenmark.app/ – The name "status.xenmark.app" could not be resolved.
  2. https://xenmark.app/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://xenmark.app.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://xenmark.app/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://xenmark.app/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://xenmark.app/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://xenmark.app/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://xenmark.app/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://xenmark.app/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://www.xenmark.app/privacy/ · checked 2026-10-28

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://xenmark.app/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://xenmark.app/privacy – found, but behind a sign-in
  3. https://xenmark.app/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://xenmark.app/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://xenmark.app/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://xenmark.app/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://xenmark.app/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 7
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.xenmark.app/dpa/ · checked 2026-10-28

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.xenmark.app/pricing/ · checked 2026-10-28

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://xenmark.app/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains.
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://xenmark.app/

Source: https://xenmark.app/ · checked 2026-10-28

✓weight 2 of 3

No third-party requests before any interaction.

Source: https://xenmark.app/ · checked 2026-10-28

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

  • Notice promised before the list changes 14 days.
    Show the exact wording

    4.4 Xenmark will give at least 14 days' prior electronic notice before a new subprocessor begins processing Customer Personal Data or an existing subprocessor is replaced.

    Read at https://www.xenmark.app/dpa/

Source: https://www.xenmark.app/dpa/ · checked 2026-10-28

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page HIPAA (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    What Xenmark does not claim Xenmark does not currently hold SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or any other formal security certification.

    Read at https://www.xenmark.app/security/

    What Xenmark does not claim Xenmark does not currently hold SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or any other formal security certification.

    Read at https://www.xenmark.app/security/

    What Xenmark does not claim Xenmark does not currently hold SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or any other formal security certification.

    Read at https://www.xenmark.app/security/

Source: https://www.xenmark.app/security/ · checked 2026-10-28

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://www.xenmark.app/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-28

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Xenmark

7 found · 5 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-28.

Investigate 5 open evidence questions
  1. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  2. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  3. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  4. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  5. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.