Alternatives to BoldSign
Other E-signature vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that BoldSign does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from BoldSign on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
BoldSign has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and BoldSign does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and BoldSign does not | BoldSign publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GetAcceptgetaccept.com | 52/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Penneopenneo.com | 52/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Sign.comsign.com | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Signaturitsignaturit.com | 40/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Scrivescrive.com | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Skribbleskribble.com | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Namirialnamirial.com | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Signicatsignicat.com | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| D-Trust Sign-Mesign-me.de | 10/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| eversigneversign.com | 65/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SignEasysigneasy.com | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Dropbox Signdropbox.com | 50/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.