Transparency alternatives to BoldSign
Other E-signature vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at BoldSign. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from BoldSign on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
BoldSign has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at BoldSign” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at BoldSign | Found at BoldSign, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eversigneversign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to eversign | 70/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GetAcceptgetaccept.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetAccept | 52/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Penneopenneo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Penneo | 52/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Youtrustyoutrust.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Youtrust | 52/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Dropbox Signdropbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dropbox Sign | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Nitrogonitro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nitro | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Scrivescrive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scrive | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Skribbleskribble.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skribble | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Sign.comsign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign.com | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Signaturitsignaturit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signaturit | 35/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| signNowsignnow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to signNow | 32/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| DocuSigndocusign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DocuSign | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.