SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Skribble

Other E-signature vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Skribble does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Skribble on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Skribble has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Skribble does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Skribble does notSkribble publishes, and they do not
BoldSignboldsign.com 83/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
SignEasysigneasy.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
GetAcceptgetaccept.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Penneopenneo.com 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
eversigneversign.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dropbox Signdropbox.com 50/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sign.comsign.com 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Signaturitsignaturit.com 40/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Scrivescrive.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Namirialnamirial.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
FP Signfp-sign.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
DocuSigndocusign.com 45/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.