Alternatives to Signaturit
Other E-signature vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Signaturit does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Signaturit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Signaturit has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Signaturit does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Signaturit does not | Signaturit publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BoldSignboldsign.com | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| eversigneversign.com | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| GetAcceptgetaccept.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Penneopenneo.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Yousignyousign.com | 45/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SignEasysigneasy.com | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Dropbox Signdropbox.com | 50/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sign.comsign.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Scrivescrive.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Skribbleskribble.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Documensodocumenso.com | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Certinalcertinal.com | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.