SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to OXID eSales

Other Ecommerce platforms vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at OXID eSales. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from OXID eSales on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

OXID eSales has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at OXID eSales” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at OXID eSalesFound at OXID eSales, not found there
Saleorsaleor.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Saleor 74/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Lightspeedlightspeedhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightspeed 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Shopifyshopify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shopify 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
commercetoolscommercetools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to commercetools 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Gumroadgumroad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gumroad 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Swellswell.isSee also Transparency alternatives to Swell 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Volusionvolusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Volusion 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Ecwidecwid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ecwid 36/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
BigCommercebigcommerce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BigCommerce 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Shoplazzashoplazza.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shoplazza 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
ChannelEnginechannelengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ChannelEngine 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Vendurevendure.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Vendure 35/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.