Alternatives to Benno MailArchiv
Other eDiscovery and archiving vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Benno MailArchiv does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Benno MailArchiv on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Benno MailArchiv has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Benno MailArchiv does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Benno MailArchiv does not | Benno MailArchiv publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCOcsdisco.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Everlaweverlaw.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hanzohanzo.co | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Jatheonjatheon.com | 45/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Mailbutlermailbutler.io | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Smarshsmarsh.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Logikculllogikcull.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ArcTitanarctitan.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CloudNinecloudnine.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Consilioconsilio.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| GoldFynchgoldfynch.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lighthouselighthouseglobal.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.