Alternatives to Automox
Other Endpoint management and security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Automox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Automox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Automox has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Automox does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Automox does not | Automox publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malwarebytesmalwarebytes.com | 83/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Addigyaddigy.com | 85/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| SentinelOnesentinelone.com | 55/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| NinjaOneninjaone.com | 52/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Jamfjamf.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kaseyakaseya.com | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Fleetfleetdm.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Scalefusionscalefusion.com | 45/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| CrowdStrikecrowdstrike.com | 43/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Syncrosyncromsp.com | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Action1action1.com | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Sophossophos.com | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.