Transparency alternatives to Malwarebytes
Other Endpoint management and security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Malwarebytes. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Malwarebytes on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Malwarebytes has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Malwarebytes” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Malwarebytes | Found at Malwarebytes, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addigyaddigy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Addigy | 87/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Automoxautomox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Automox | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Levellevel.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Level | 61/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Esperesper.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Esper | 52/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| NinjaOneninjaone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NinjaOne | 52/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Action1action1.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Action1 | 48/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| SentinelOnesentinelone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SentinelOne | 48/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Scalefusionscalefusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scalefusion | 43/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Fleetfleetdm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fleet | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Swifswif.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Swif | 35/100 | 1 Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| CrowdStrikecrowdstrike.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CrowdStrike | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Iruiru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Iru | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.