Transparency alternatives to PDQ Connect
Other Endpoint management and security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PDQ Connect does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from PDQ Connect on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PDQ Connect has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and PDQ Connect does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and PDQ Connect does not | PDQ Connect publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addigyaddigy.com | 87/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Malwarebytesmalwarebytes.com | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Hexnodehexnode.com | 62/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Levellevel.io | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Automoxautomox.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Kaseyakaseya.com | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| NinjaOneninjaone.com | 52/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Fleetfleetdm.com | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SentinelOnesentinelone.com | 48/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Scalefusionscalefusion.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Swifswif.ai | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Action1action1.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.