SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Scalefusion

Other Endpoint management and security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Scalefusion does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Scalefusion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Scalefusion has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Scalefusion does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Scalefusion does notScalefusion publishes, and they do not
Addigyaddigy.com 85/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Malwarebytesmalwarebytes.com 83/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Automoxautomox.com 60/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Kaseyakaseya.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
SentinelOnesentinelone.com 55/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
NinjaOneninjaone.com 52/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Fleetfleetdm.com 48/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Iruiru.com 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Miradoremiradore.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Jamfjamf.com 35/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Syncrosyncromsp.com 35/100 1 Status page with history 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Action1action1.com 30/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.