Transparency alternatives to Density
Other Energy management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Density. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Density on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Density has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Density” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Density | Found at Density, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurablmeasurabl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Measurabl | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Deepkideepki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepki | 33/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Envelioenvelio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envelio | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Gridxgridx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridx | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Meteocontrolmeteocontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meteocontrol | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Arbncoarbnco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arbnco | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Butlrbutlr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Butlr | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Arcadiaarcadia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcadia | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Gridpointgridpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridpoint | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Janitzajanitza.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Janitza | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Kiwigridkiwigrid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kiwigrid | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Spacewellspacewell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spacewell | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.