Transparency alternatives to Kiwigrid
Other Energy management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kiwigrid. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Kiwigrid on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kiwigrid has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Kiwigrid” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Kiwigrid | Found at Kiwigrid, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Densitydensity.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Density | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Measurablmeasurabl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Measurabl | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Deepkideepki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepki | 33/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Envelioenvelio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envelio | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Gridxgridx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridx | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Meteocontrolmeteocontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meteocontrol | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Arbncoarbnco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arbnco | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Butlrbutlr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Butlr | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Energycapenergycap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Energycap | 23/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Arcadiaarcadia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcadia | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sensesense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sense | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Janitzajanitza.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Janitza | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.