Transparency alternatives to Meteocontrol
Other Energy management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Meteocontrol. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Meteocontrol on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Meteocontrol has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Meteocontrol” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Meteocontrol | Found at Meteocontrol, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Densitydensity.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Density | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Measurablmeasurabl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Measurabl | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Arcadiaarcadia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcadia | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deepkideepki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepki | 33/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Envelioenvelio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envelio | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Energycapenergycap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Energycap | 23/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Sensesense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sense | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Centinelcentinelre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Centinel | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kiwigridkiwigrid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kiwigrid | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SRSworx EPICsrsworx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SRSworx EPIC | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tangotangoanalytics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tango | 17/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| 75F75f.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to 75F | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.