Transparency alternatives to Deepki
Other Energy management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Deepki. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Deepki on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Deepki has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Deepki” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Deepki | Found at Deepki, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Densitydensity.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Density | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Measurablmeasurabl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Measurabl | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gridxgridx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridx | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Meteocontrolmeteocontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meteocontrol | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Energycapenergycap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Energycap | 23/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Arcadiaarcadia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcadia | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sensesense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sense | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Centinelcentinelre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Centinel | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Janitzajanitza.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Janitza | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Spacewellspacewell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Spacewell | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| SRSworx EPICsrsworx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SRSworx EPIC | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tangotangoanalytics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tango | 17/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.