Transparency alternatives to NutraSoft
Other ERP for mid-market vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at NutraSoft. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from NutraSoft on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
NutraSoft has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at NutraSoft” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at NutraSoft | Found at NutraSoft, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scopevisioscopevisio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scopevisio | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Erplyerply.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Erply | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| INNERGYinnergy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to INNERGY | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Axix Technologiesaxixtechnologies.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axix Technologies | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Frappefrappe.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Frappe | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Business Manager Enterprisebusinessmanerp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Business Manager Enterprise | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Windward Softwarewindwardsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Windward Software | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Acumaticaacumatica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acumatica | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| DataCruddatacrud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataCrud | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Myfactorymyfactory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Myfactory | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| OptiPro Manufacturing Cloudoptiproerp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OptiPro Manufacturing Cloud | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| AllSolutionsallsolutions.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to AllSolutions | 10/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.