SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Windward Software

Other ERP for mid-market vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Windward Software does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 85 that differ from Windward Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Windward Software has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Windward Software does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Windward Software does notWindward Software publishes, and they do not
Erplyerply.com 52/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Scopevisioscopevisio.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Axix Technologiesaxixtechnologies.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Frappefrappe.io 35/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
INNERGYinnergy.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
NutraSoftnutrasoft.ca 26/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Manaxomanaxo.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Business Manager Enterprisebusinessmanerp.com 26/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cetec ERPcetecerp.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Myfactorymyfactory.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
OptiPro Manufacturing Cloudoptiproerp.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
AFASafas.nl 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.