SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to LaunchDarkly

Other Feature flags and experimentation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that LaunchDarkly does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from LaunchDarkly on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LaunchDarkly has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and LaunchDarkly does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and LaunchDarkly does notLaunchDarkly publishes, and they do not
Reflagreflag.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Convertconvert.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
ConfigCatconfigcat.com 30/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Statsigstatsig.com 70/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
GrowthBookgrowthbook.io 61/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Splitsplit.io 52/100 1 Data location stated 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Harnessharness.io 48/100 1 Data location stated 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Optimizelyoptimizely.com 39/100 1 Data location stated 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Omniconvertomniconvert.com 38/100 1 Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Flagsmithflagsmith.com 35/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Kameleoonkameleoon.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Kimchikimchi.dev 35/100 1 Data location stated 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.