Alternatives to Reflag
Other Feature flags and experimentation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Reflag does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Reflag on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reflag has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Reflag does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Reflag does not | Reflag publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statsigstatsig.com | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| LaunchDarklylaunchdarkly.com | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Splitsplit.io | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Harnessharness.io | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Flagsmithflagsmith.com | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| CloudBeescloudbees.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| GrowthBookgrowthbook.io | 61/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Optimizelyoptimizely.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Midamida.so | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| ConfigCatconfigcat.com | 30/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Omniconvertomniconvert.com | 38/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Kameleoonkameleoon.com | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.