SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to VWO

Other Feature flags and experimentation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that VWO does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from VWO on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

VWO has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and VWO does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and VWO does notVWO publishes, and they do not
Flagsmithflagsmith.com 35/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
LaunchDarklylaunchdarkly.com 57/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Statsigstatsig.com 57/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Unleashgetunleash.io 48/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Midamida.so 35/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 Compare
ConfigCatconfigcat.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Prefabprefab.cloud 13/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 Compare
Reflagreflag.com 61/100 1 Public pricing 3 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
GrowthBookgrowthbook.io 48/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Harnessharness.io 48/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Omniconvertomniconvert.com 38/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Splitsplit.io 38/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.