SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to HindSite

Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that HindSite does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 53 that differ from HindSite on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

HindSite has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and HindSite does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and HindSite does notHindSite publishes, and they do not
ServiceM8servicem8.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Fulcrumfulcrumapp.com 45/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ServiceTitanservicetitan.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Skeduloskedulo.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Praxedopraxedo.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
FieldEdgefieldedge.com 36/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ServicePowerservicepower.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Jobbergetjobber.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Tap Inspecttapinspect.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Uptickuptickhq.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Arezarez.io 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Fieldcodefieldcode.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.