SaaS transparency ranking · Industry and operations
Field service management vendors, ranked by what they publish
Field service and dispatch software, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
4 vendors measured on their own sites, last on 2026-09-02. 4 ranked. A vendor we could not measure often enough gets no rank at all, rather than a bad one.
Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.
- Field service management24
- All categories26
4 vendors
Sort by Score Name Last checked
Filters (0)
- ✓ found, source linked
- × not found at the addresses we checked
- – not measured by us
- 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
-
1
Aspireyouraspire.comTransparency 35/100 EBand E
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 7 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 35/100 = weight of what we found (8) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 1 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 4 criteria: Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 8 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
2
Fieldcodefieldcode.comTransparency 26/100 EBand E
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 8 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 26/100 = weight of what we found (6) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 2 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 3 criteria: Data location stated ×3, Public pricing ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 9 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
3
OptimoRouteoptimoroute.comTransparency 22/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 8 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 22/100 = weight of what we found (5) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 3 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 3 criteria: Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 9 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
4
BigChangebigchange.comTransparency 17/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: found
- Certifications named: found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 8 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 17/100 = weight of what we found (4) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 4 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 3 criteria: Public pricing ×2, Certifications named ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 9 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
Tick two vendors above.
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.