SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Tap Inspect

Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tap Inspect does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 55 that differ from Tap Inspect on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tap Inspect has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Tap Inspect does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tap Inspect does notTap Inspect publishes, and they do not
ServiceM8servicem8.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
ServiceTitanservicetitan.com 30/100 4 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Fulcrumfulcrumapp.com 45/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Praxedopraxedo.com 43/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
Jobbergetjobber.com 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Arezarez.io 26/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
ServicePowerservicepower.com 26/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Skeduloskedulo.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Uptickuptickhq.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Bella FSMbellafsm.com 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Fieldpointfieldpoint.net 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Aspireyouraspire.com 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.