Transparency alternatives to Golfmanager
Other Golf club management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Golfmanager. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Golfmanager on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Golfmanager has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Golfmanager” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Golfmanager | Found at Golfmanager, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golf Geniusgolfgenius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Golf Genius | 50/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Golfsoftwaregolfsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Golfsoftware | 35/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| GolfNow Businessgolfnow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GolfNow Business | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Teesnapteesnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesnap | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Club Systemsclubsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Club Systems | 18/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Chronogolfchronogolf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronogolf | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Jonas Clubjonasclub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jonas Club | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Toptracertoptracer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toptracer | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| GolfBoxgolfbox.netSee also Transparency alternatives to GolfBox | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| HowDidiDohowdidido.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HowDidiDo | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Northstar Clubglobalnorthstar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Northstar Club | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| TenFore Golftenfore.golfSee also Transparency alternatives to TenFore Golf | 13/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.