SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Golf Genius

Other Golf club management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Golf Genius. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Golf Genius on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Golf Genius has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Golf Genius” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Golf GeniusFound at Golf Genius, not found there
Golfmanagergolfmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Golfmanager 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
TenFore Golftenfore.golfSee also Transparency alternatives to TenFore Golf 13/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Golfsoftwaregolfsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Golfsoftware 35/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
GolfNow Businessgolfnow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GolfNow Business 26/100 1 Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Teesnapteesnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesnap 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Clubspeedclubspeed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clubspeed 9/100 1 Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Tagmarshaltagmarshal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tagmarshal 9/100 1 Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Intelligent Golfintelligentgolf.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Intelligent Golf 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Club Systemsclubsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Club Systems 18/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Chronogolfchronogolf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronogolf 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Jonas Clubjonasclub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jonas Club 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Toptracertoptracer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Toptracer 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.