Transparency alternatives to Golfsoftware
Other Golf club management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Golfsoftware. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Golfsoftware on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Golfsoftware has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Golfsoftware” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Golfsoftware | Found at Golfsoftware, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golfmanagergolfmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Golfmanager | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Golf Geniusgolfgenius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Golf Genius | 50/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| GolfNow Businessgolfnow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GolfNow Business | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TenFore Golftenfore.golfSee also Transparency alternatives to TenFore Golf | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Teesnapteesnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesnap | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Chronogolfchronogolf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronogolf | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BRS Golfbrsgolf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BRS Golf | 9/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Clubspeedclubspeed.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clubspeed | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Tagmarshaltagmarshal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tagmarshal | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Intelligent Golfintelligentgolf.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Intelligent Golf | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Club Systemsclubsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Club Systems | 18/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Jonas Clubjonasclub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jonas Club | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.