SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Hotelspider

Other Hotel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Hotelspider does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Hotelspider on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Hotelspider has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Hotelspider does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Hotelspider does notHotelspider publishes, and they do not
Beyondbeyondpricing.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Roomprice Genieroompricegenie.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Clock PMSclock-software.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Lodgifylodgify.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Guestyguesty.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Ownerrezownerrez.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Duettoduettocloud.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Streamlinestreamlinevrs.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Fideliofidelio.at 24/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Beds24beds24.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Escapiaescapia.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Gastfreundgastfreund.net 17/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.