Transparency alternatives to Oasis Security
Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Oasis Security does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Oasis Security on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Oasis Security has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Oasis Security does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Oasis Security does not | Oasis Security publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Owlaccessowl.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Avatieravatier.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Hyprhypr.com | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GAT Labsgatlabs.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Imprivataimprivata.com | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Simeiosimeio.com | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Beta Systemsbetasystems.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Clear Skyeclearskye.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Ipgipg-group.com | 23/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Entitleentitle.io | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Evidian Orbionevidian.com | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Radiantlogicradiantlogic.com | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.