SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Beta Systems

Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Beta Systems does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from Beta Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Beta Systems has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Beta Systems does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Beta Systems does notBeta Systems publishes, and they do not
Hyprhypr.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Imprivataimprivata.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Access Owlaccessowl.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Entitleentitle.io 35/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Identityautomationidentityautomation.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Stratastrata.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ipgipg-group.com 23/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
Optimal Idmoptimalidm.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sonraisonraisecurity.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Gluugluu.org 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Omadaomadaidentity.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Tools4evertools4ever.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.