Transparency alternatives to Identityautomation
Other Identity governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Identityautomation. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Identityautomation on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Identityautomation has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Identityautomation” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Identityautomation | Found at Identityautomation, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyprhypr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hypr | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Oasis Securityoasis.securitySee also Transparency alternatives to Oasis Security | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Access Owlaccessowl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Access Owl | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Imprivataimprivata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imprivata | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Simeiosimeio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simeio | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Avatieravatier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Avatier | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Beta Systemsbetasystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beta Systems | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Clear Skyeclearskye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clear Skye | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Ipgipg-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ipg | 23/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| GAT Labsgatlabs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GAT Labs | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gluugluu.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Gluu | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Radiantlogicradiantlogic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Radiantlogic | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.