Alternatives to incident.io
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that incident.io does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 22 that differ from incident.io on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
incident.io has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and incident.io does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and incident.io does not | incident.io publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ilertilert.com | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.com | 61/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Causelycausely.ai | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| AlertOpsalertops.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| FireHydrantfirehydrant.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.app | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.io | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Everbridgeeverbridge.com | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| PagerDutypagerduty.com | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| PagerTreepagertree.com | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Spike.shspike.sh | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| xMattersxmatters.com | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.