Alternatives to Hyperping
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Hyperping does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Hyperping on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Hyperping has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Hyperping does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Hyperping does not | Hyperping publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ilertilert.com | 70/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.com | 61/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| OhDearohdear.app | 61/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Causelycausely.ai | 48/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Rootlyrootly.com | 43/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.io | 65/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Uptime.comuptime.com | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| AlertOpsalertops.com | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.io | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| PagerDutypagerduty.com | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Status.iostatus.io | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| SIGNL4signl4.com | 30/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.