Alternatives to OhDear
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that OhDear does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from OhDear on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
OhDear has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and OhDear does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and OhDear does not | OhDear publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperpinghyperping.io | 74/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ilertilert.com | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.io | 65/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.com | 61/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.io | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Causelycausely.ai | 48/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Uptime.comuptime.com | 48/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| AlertOpsalertops.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| xMattersxmatters.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Sorrysorryapp.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Zendutyzenduty.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.app | 48/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.