SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to SIGNL4

Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SIGNL4 does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 31 that differ from SIGNL4 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

SIGNL4 has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and SIGNL4 does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and SIGNL4 does notSIGNL4 publishes, and they do not
incident.ioincident.io 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Hyperpinghyperping.io 74/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
ilertilert.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Moogsoftmoogsoft.com 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
BigPandabigpanda.io 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
OhDearohdear.app 61/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Uptime.comuptime.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
All Quietallquiet.app 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Causelycausely.ai 48/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
AlertOpsalertops.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Rootlyrootly.com 43/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Everbridgeeverbridge.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.