SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Heepsy

Other Influencer marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Heepsy. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Heepsy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Heepsy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Heepsy” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at HeepsyFound at Heepsy, not found there
Modashmodash.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Modash 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Influencityinfluencity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Influencity 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Storyclashstoryclash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storyclash 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
HypeAuditorhypeauditor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HypeAuditor 33/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
GRINgrin.coSee also Transparency alternatives to GRIN 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Traackrtraackr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traackr 17/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
CreatorIQcreatoriq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CreatorIQ 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Open Influenceopeninfluence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Open Influence 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Woomiowoomio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Woomio 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Captiv8captiv8.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Captiv8 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Sideqiksideqik.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sideqik 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Insenseinsense.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Insense 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.