Transparency alternatives to Traackr
Other Influencer marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Traackr. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Traackr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Traackr has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Traackr” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Traackr | Found at Traackr, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modashmodash.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Modash | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Storyclashstoryclash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storyclash | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Influencityinfluencity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Influencity | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| HypeAuditorhypeauditor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HypeAuditor | 33/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Heepsyheepsy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heepsy | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Insenseinsense.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Insense | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| GRINgrin.coSee also Transparency alternatives to GRIN | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Open Influenceopeninfluence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Open Influence | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| CreatorIQcreatoriq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CreatorIQ | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Minisocialminisocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Minisocial | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Afluencerafluencer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Afluencer | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kolsquarekolsquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kolsquare | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.