Transparency alternatives to Modash
Other Influencer marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Modash. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Modash on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Modash has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Modash” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Modash | Found at Modash, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HypeAuditorhypeauditor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HypeAuditor | 33/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| CreatorIQcreatoriq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CreatorIQ | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Traackrtraackr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traackr | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Heepsyheepsy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heepsy | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Insenseinsense.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Insense | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Minisocialminisocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Minisocial | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| GRINgrin.coSee also Transparency alternatives to GRIN | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Open Influenceopeninfluence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Open Influence | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Woomiowoomio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Woomio | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Billobillo.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Billo | 13/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Captiv8captiv8.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Captiv8 | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Storyclashstoryclash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storyclash | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.