Transparency alternatives to Order Time Inventory
Other Inventory management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Order Time Inventory. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Order Time Inventory on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Order Time Inventory has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Order Time Inventory” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Order Time Inventory | Found at Order Time Inventory, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ordoroordoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ordoro | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Brahmin Solutionsbrahmin-solutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brahmin Solutions | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ShipHeroshiphero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipHero | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| EazyStockeazystock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EazyStock | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| inFlowinflowinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to inFlow | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Linnworkslinnworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Linnworks | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SOS Inventorysosinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SOS Inventory | 50/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Asset.Guruasset.guruSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset.Guru | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cin7cin7.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cin7 | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fishbowlfishbowlinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fishbowl | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Inventory Procissltd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inventory Pro | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pickwarepickware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pickware | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.