SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to inFlow

Other Inventory management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at inFlow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from inFlow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

inFlow has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at inFlow” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at inFlowFound at inFlow, not found there
Ordoroordoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ordoro 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Brahmin Solutionsbrahmin-solutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brahmin Solutions 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
SOS Inventorysosinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SOS Inventory 37/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Cin7cin7.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cin7 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
ShipBobshipbob.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipBob 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
EazyStockeazystock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EazyStock 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ShipHeroshiphero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipHero 39/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Fishbowlfishbowlinventory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fishbowl 35/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Linnworkslinnworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Linnworks 30/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Katanakatanamrp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Katana 29/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Billbeebillbee.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Billbee 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Extensivextensiv.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Extensiv 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.