Transparency alternatives to Laser Ticketing
Other Label and artwork management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Laser Ticketing. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 15 that differ from Laser Ticketing on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Laser Ticketing has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Laser Ticketing” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Laser Ticketing | Found at Laser Ticketing, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aprooveaproove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aproove | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Lytholytho.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lytho | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| GlobalVisionglobalvision.coSee also Transparency alternatives to GlobalVision | 38/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| IntelligenceBankintelligencebank.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IntelligenceBank | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| ManageArtworksmanageartworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ManageArtworks | 26/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| InformaIT Content Compareinformait.comSee also Transparency alternatives to InformaIT Content Compare | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Artwork Flowartworkflowhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Artwork Flow | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Chili Publishchili-publish.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chili Publish | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| NutriLabnutrilab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NutriLab | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Anthillanthillplatform.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anthill | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Loftwareloftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loftware | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Foodwarefoodware365.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foodware | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.