SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cenevo

Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cenevo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Cenevo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cenevo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Cenevo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cenevo does notCenevo publishes, and they do not
Nethealth Labnethealth.com 52/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Benchlingbenchling.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Genemodgenemod.net 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Quartzyquartzy.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Scispotscispot.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Rspaceresearchspace.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Dotmaticsdotmatics.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Dornerdorner.de 22/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Starlimsstarlims.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Labsteplabstep.com 17/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Novopathnovopath.com 17/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Nexus Labnexus-ag.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.