Transparency alternatives to GoSkills
Other Learning management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that GoSkills does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from GoSkills on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
GoSkills has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and GoSkills does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and GoSkills does not | GoSkills publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skilljarskilljar.com | 70/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Codiocodio.com | 57/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Teachableteachable.com | 57/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TalentLMStalentlms.com | 52/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| LearnWorldslearnworlds.com | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Anthologyanthology.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Edmingleedmingle.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| D2Ld2l.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Arloarlo.co | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| eloomieloomi.com | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Continucontinu.com | 30/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Articulatearticulate.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.