SaaS Ranking

SaaS transparency ranking · Finance and legal

Legal practice management vendors, ranked by what they publish

Law firm and legal practice software, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.

12 vendors measured on their own sites, last on 2026-09-02. 11 ranked, 1 without enough data for a score. A vendor we could not measure often enough gets no rank at all, rather than a bad one.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.

  • Legal practice management22
  • All categories26
Median transparency score, out of 100. Legal practice management sits below the median across every category we measure.
Show only vendors where we found

Transparency band

1 without enough data for a band

12 vendors

Sort by Score Name Last checked

Filters (0)
Show only vendors where we found

Transparency band

1 without enough data for a band

  • found, source linked
  • not found at the addresses we checked
  • not measured by us
  • 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
Tick two vendors, then press this.

Tick two vendors above.

Not in the ranking

We could not measure this product with our method, so it is listed here instead of being scored. This says something about our method, not about the vendor.

  • HighQ – We found no product-specific domain: thomsonreuters.com is the group front page for its whole product range.

This category, criterion by criterion

How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.

Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.