Transparency alternatives to Matters.Cloud
Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Matters.Cloud. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Matters.Cloud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Matters.Cloud has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Matters.Cloud” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Matters.Cloud | Found at Matters.Cloud, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luminanceluminance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Luminance | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cerenadecerenade.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerenade | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Amberloamberlo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amberlo | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Litifylitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Litify | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Smokeballsmokeball.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smokeball | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Aderantaderant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aderant | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| MyCasemycase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyCase | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Eliteelite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elite | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly Neos | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Definelydefinely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Definely | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Josefjoseflegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Josef | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| LEAPleap.usSee also Transparency alternatives to LEAP | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.