Transparency alternatives to Luminance
Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Luminance. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Luminance on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Luminance has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Luminance” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Luminance | Found at Luminance, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MyCasemycase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyCase | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| PracticePantherpracticepanther.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PracticePanther | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Amberloamberlo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Amberlo | 43/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assembly Neos | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Litifylitify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Litify | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Matters.Cloudmatters.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to Matters.Cloud | 35/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Smokeballsmokeball.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smokeball | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Tabs3tabs3.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tabs3 | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Legitolegito.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Legito | 29/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| CARET Legalcaretlegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CARET Legal | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| CosmoLexcosmolex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CosmoLex | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Lawcuslawcus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lawcus | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.